Mistress of the Art of Death by Ariana Franklin.

Week 19 concludes my list. I mean, I’m not really done – I haven’t read ‘em all – but reading stuff other people chose was getting tiring. Time I choose myself. I do feel like I’m pretty good at choosing books I like (and dislike… I chose Marked after all!) so from now on, I read mostly what I want. I am reading some stuff from the list that I wanted to read anyway (like the Princess Bride and Confessions of an Ugly Step Sister). But let’s get the last week of obeying the list over with. This is Mistress of the Art of Death by Ariana Franklin.

Title: Dødens herskerinde
Original title: Mistress of the Art of Death
By: Ariana Franklin
Pages: 378
Published by Aschehoug Dansk forlag 2007
First published 2007

A chilling, mesmerizing novel that combines the best of modern forensic thrillers with the detail and drama of historical fiction.

In medieval Cambridge, England, four children have been murdered. The crimes are immediately blamed on the town’s Jewish community, taken as evidence that Jews sacrifice Christian children in blasphemous ceremonies. To save them from the rioting mob, the king places the Cambridge Jews under his protection and hides them in a castle fortress. King Henry I is no friend of the Jews-or anyone, really-but he is invested in their fate. Without the taxes received from Jewish merchants, his treasuries would go bankrupt. Hoping scientific investigation will exonerate the Jews, Henry calls on his cousin the King of Sicily-whose subjects include the best medical experts in Europe-and asks for his finest “master of the art of death,” an early version of the medical examiner. The Italian doctor chosen for the task is a young prodigy from the University of Salerno. But her name is Adelia-the king has been sent a mistress of the art of death.

Adelia and her companions-Simon, a Jew, and Mansur, a Moor-travel to England to unravel the mystery of the Cambridge murders, which turn out to be the work of a serial killer, most likely one who has been on Crusade with the king. In a backward and superstitious country like England, Adelia must conceal her true identity as a doctor in order to avoid accusations of witchcraft. Along the way, she is assisted by Sir Rowley Picot, one of the king’s tax collectors, a man with a personal stake in the investigation. Rowley may be a needed friend, or the fiend for whom they are searching. As Adelia’s investigation takes her into Cambridge’s shadowy river paths and behind the closed doors of its churches and nunneries, the hunt intensifies and the killer prepares to strike again .

***

Rating on Goodreads: (liked it)

Right, finally. Only took me a coulple of weeks *cough* Right, so seeing as this is a review, I guess it all boils down to whether or not I like the book. So… do I?

Short answer: no.

Long answer: actually kind of yes but then not but… Right, let’s just do it the usual way.
So, what I expected from this book and what I got was very different. I expected a pretty straightforward, simple crime story set in Medieval England. What I got was historical fiction with a crime story, sorta. It’s not really a bad thing, but when your expectations are turned around like this, you can’t help but feel a certain disappointment. Before we talk more about that, though, let’s talk about the stuff I usually do.

First off the writing, which I found to be confusing. Sometimes, I found that another thing was happening while I thought that other stuff was happening. Some sentences were downright clumsy, but it’s hard to say whether it’s the writer’s fault or the translater. It’s generally very beautiful prose with some effective descriptions, but at the same time it was just difficult to keep track of what was going on. The narrative was sort of all over the place.

When it comes to the characters, they are actually nice and memorable, which is one reason this book is not a one or a two. I like them well enough, the main character probably less so, and they added some to the story. When I say I probably didn’t like the main character much, it’s because she suffers from that all too common problem: the author just liked her too much. She is taken too seriously and thus I can’t take her seriously. Everytime her entire name was mentioned like a sort of title, probably to sound cool, it just seemed melodramatic and I kind of giggled. Other than that – the other characters were neat and good fun. It’s not like Franklin is the first to fall in love with her main character.

The story is where I kind of grind to a halt and start really dislinking. There’s a crime story in this book, there really is, and it’s interesting and intriguing and I really like it. It’s just not focused enough. See, Franklin used to write historical fiction and not historical thrillers and it shows, I’m afraid. She has done an absolutely stunning amount of research, and it is impressive as holy applejuice, but I only know this because of the massive infodumping.
Now, I actually like infodumping here and there and this is the first time (except for Clive Cussler) I really see how it can be a disadvantage. There is so much info in there and that would be cool if I read this because it was historical fiction, but I read it for the murder mystery. An intriguing murder mystery that is completely drowned by so much other stuff. It’s description heavy too, and while very poetic and beautiful it’s just way too much.
In the end, the mystery was resolved and I liked the resolve and I liked the mystery, but even after the end of the murder mystery, the story dragged on and on and I just got bored by the last fifty pages.

In the end, I’ll give Franklin that I liked the mystery but there was just not enough of it. Less description of feasts and dresses and pretty rivers and birdies could have made it better for me. I do see a lot of positive reviews on Goodreads, so perhaps I’m just the weird one out. I did like this book, I just wanted more murder mystery and less description of medieval life, but if you don’t agree with me on that, you’ll probably like this very well.

Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell by Susanna Clarke – I Fail

Week 11 and I fail. How much do I fail? Enough that we’re actually in week 12 and I’ve decided to give up on a book and I’m dragging my way through the next. I decided not to finish Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell as it’s not humanly possible (for me) to do it within a week. Here is a short description of why (this is not a full review and the rating only reflects how I’m not able to finish it).

Title: Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell
By: Susanna Clarke
Pages: 769
Published by Gyldendal, 2005
First published 2005

Centuries ago, when magic still existed in England, the greatest magician of them all was the Raven King. A human child brought up by fairies, the Raven King blended fairy wisdom and human reason to create English magic. Now, at the beginning of the nineteenth century, he is barely more than a legend, and England, with its mad King and its dashing poets, no longer believes in practical magic.

Then the reclusive Mr Norrell of Hurtfew Abbey appears and causes the statues of York Cathedral to speak and move. News spreads of the return of magic to England and, persuaded that he must help the government in the war against Napoleon, Mr Norrell goes to London. There he meets a brilliant young magician and takes him as a pupil. Jonathan Strange is charming, rich and arrogant. Together, they dazzle the country with their feats.

But the partnership soon turns to rivalry. Mr Norrell has never conquered his lifelong habits of secrecy, while Strange will always be attracted to the wildest, most perilous magic. He becomes fascinated by the shadowy figure of the Raven King, and his heedless pursuit of long-forgotten magic threatens, not only his partnership with Norrell, but everything that he holds dear.

***

Rating on Goodreads: (it was okay)

Nope, can’t do it. I won’t be able to finish this within any foreseeable future. There are many reasons for this but mainly, I think, it’s because the story doesn’t draw me in as much as I’d like.

I want to like this – I know it’s supposed to be brilliant and as far as writing, characters, and plot are concerned, it’s not a disappointment – I just can’t finish it. The rating of two start reflect my inability to finish it. I read about halfway through and I just don’t feel that urge to press on. The plot, while good, just isn’t very interesting to me. There is a lot of story going on and a lot of plot lines and I can’t help but feeling that while these stories are okay, this could have been much shorter (though, take that with a grain of salt – I haven’t actually finished it).

Really, this is not a bad book, this even had moments where I almost felt compelled to read on and on and the book is very funny in a dry, ironic sort of way, but I just couldn’t finish and so far – no, I’m not going to finish this. It’s going to go on my list for next year (the half that I haven’t read, at least) and I’ll see if I’ll be able to kill it by then.

I’m really disappointed in myself (I finished Marked but I couldn’t finish this, which was supposed to be brilliant? Stupid me) but alas – what can I do? I’m going to be way behind schedule and I have some books of 4-500 pages ahead of me. Sorry, guys. And sorry to my own perfectionism which is going to beat me with a stick.

7.a by Bjarne Reuter

Week 3 and wouldn’t you know it: I’m ahead of schedule again. Aww, yeah! This book’s down and I’m already on page 104 of A Game of Thrones, which I so far like very, very well. But this blog’s not for me gushing about that brilliantly entertaining book, it’s about 7.a, so let’s get to it!

Title: 7.a
By: Bjarne Reuter
Pages: 176
Published by Gyldendal, 1992, Denmark

7.a and their two teachers go to on a trip staying in an old house by the sea. Slowly they realise that there’s a fateful connection between them and a ship that once went missing.

***

Rating on Goodreads:  (It’s okay)

This was very much a mixed blessing for me, I will say. I started out thinking: Right, this is actually good, but as the book progressed I got more and more annoyed with the characters and in the end I didn’t feel like there was any climax – I feel cheated. This should have been good.

At first, I liked it well enough – the writing was somewhat more mature than I expected and that’s always a thumbs up in litterature meant for younger audiences. It assumes that young people have a vocabulary and as far as I’m concerned that’s both true and important to keep in mind. The good didn’t last all the way through, unfortunately.

I didn’t care much for the writing. Reuter favours a lot of short sentences, a lot of leaving out and a lot of… breaks in sentences where it… didn’t seem natural to… me. The dialogue seemed a bit stiff to me as well – I can’t imagine anyone speaking the way they do in this book and especially not children in the seventh grade. All the way through they seemed like tiny adults or high school students to me.

Character wise it’s not boring but not amazing either – I liked them well enough (some of them) and even if the characters by themselves weren’t very convincing, the group dynamics of the children in the class was very believable. You wonder why he made some of the choices that he did, though: Why is a male teacher that’s kind of like a big child and too full of himself necessary? He became my pet peeve throughout the story. This is just my opinion, but he seemed to me to be outrageously annoying at times.

The plot had a lot of potential and yet I still felt let down. There was a certain chill factor to the beginning but it just started to ebb out and with the ending I really wondered why one reviewer on the back of the book calls it a psychological thriller.

I really liked how he used more subtle hints to suggest a link between the teachers plus the children and the story of the ship – it’s beautifully suggested and then he has to go mess it up by stating openly that this connection exists – with all the subtlety of a hammer to the face. This is not necessary! I figured it out early on and so can a younger reader. Let them draw their own conclusions – it’ll only benefit them in the end. Once again: Young people aren’t stupid. Most, at least.

In the end, I don’t love this but I don’t hate it either. I’m obviously not in the target demographic and he does some things well. I still respect Bjarne Reuter as a writer – he’s unavoidable when speaking of Danish litterature and I grew up with some of his stories. Even then, I don’t have to adore everything he’s ever made and while this is an easy and somewhat enjoyable read, it’s not really my thing.

Borrowed Books

Sometimes, I don’t wanna buy books or, more often, I want to but I can’t afford it because I spent my money on a Yogscast T-shirt, Assassin’s Creed comics and cat food. And that’s when the library and kind people come in handy! Sometimes, even kind people at the library.

From the Library I got my hands on 7.a by Bjarne Reuter (left)(Danish book), I’ve already finished it and the review is coming up soon. Woohoo!

To the right: L. Frank Baum’s The Wizard of Oz which I borrowed from my friend. Don’t know how long I’ll hold on to it, ’cause no one knows when I’ll be reading it. Only time – and the draw from my little Twilight Eclipse*-box will tell!

*No, I am not, in fact, a fan of the Twilight saga. Quite the opposite and therefore a friend of mine gave me a little Twilight candy-box with lovely Edward Cullen on the front *le facepalm* when I made little pieces of paper with the numbers of the books on them it seemed so brilliantly obvious to draw them from this little box. Useless fact for ya.

Journal 64 – Jussi Adler-Olsen

Week 2 and so much for being ahead of schedule. My assignment in Greek colonisation put a screeching halt to that! It had an archaeological focus which is pretty much like poking a philologist in the eye. Thank you very much. Enough of that, though, let’s down to business – Adler-Olsen’s business!

Title: Journal 64
By: Jussi Adler-Olsen
Pages: 462
Published by Politikens forlag, 2010, Copenhagen.

When Nete Hermansen’s past catches up on her, it turns into one of Department Q’s most complex cases yet. A series of disappearances turn into a far bigger case when Carl and his assistants find evidence that a series of chilling injustices have been committed for years – and are still happening.

As if Carl Mørck hadn’t already enough to do with the murder case that he might be implicated in and his personal life that’s far from perfect – he is now also involved in a case that endangers his own and his two assistants’ lives as well.

***

My rating on Goodreads: (Really liked it)

Right, so this is my fourth attempt at writing this review – I’ve made a draft and everything! Because for some reason, this review’s difficult for me. Could be because I actually like it, could be because I’m gonna post this thing to Facebook. Well, who cares – let’s get down to business!

Let’s first deal with the few things I weren’t too fond of. First, this book kind of reminds me of ‘Disgrace’ (Da: ‘Fasanjagt’) which is my least favourite of the series. Second, the superduper evil male characters keep popping up to make life miserable for poor women – to be fair, though, the big bad of this novel had a soft side to him, and the poor woman had a bit of a dark side. I guess it’s still a nice balance between good and evil. So there we are – I ended up ruining the second thing I didn’t like. I guess I like it anyway.

Now for all the stuff I love and we’ll start out by getting technical: Adler-Olsen is a master of his craft. Every single character has their own unique voice and he manages to give it to them mostly through brilliantly crafted dialogue. He’s always been good at characters but in this one – ho boy, does it show!

You see, I always liked the main character of the series – he was cool enough, adding a cynical and sarcastic perspective to the story, but from this book onwards (more, please?) I really love this character. I won’t reveal anything, but a certain event finally let’s Carl Mørck’s true feelings spill through and it’s such a powerful thing, it made me respect Adler-Olsen even more.

Assad, of course, is still my favourite character – actually, he’s probably one of my favourite fictional characters. Period. Need I say more on this?

In the end, all that’s left to mention is the brilliancy of the plot – it’s put together fantastically to lead up to a conclusion that even surprised me. This is brilliant storytelling and hopefully Adler-Olsen will teach other Danish crime writers to not sacrifice character development, action and plot in the name of realism. Go Jussi!

I’d like to apologise for the sucky resumé of the book – my English is horrendous today and as I apparently lacked the talent to translate the one on the back of the book, I had to write one myself. Sucky doesn’t cut it, really. Sorry guys!

45 Books in 2012

I had a writer’s crisis recently and it led me to ponder the wise words of Mr. Stephen King who says that J. K. Rowling is a magnificent writer and Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a damn… wait, sorry, actually, the wise words I pondered were what he says about reading and writing – that if you don’t have the time to read, you don’t have the time or the tools to write.

And hey, I want tools! So, what’re you gonna do when you’re a university student with two written assignments coming up and too much homework to count? You’re gonna read a book a week for the rest of the year, that’s what! Rather than just picking out 45 books on my own, I decided to let other people choose for me and this is the list of 45 books – y’know, to broaden my horizon. Surprisingly, these lovely people decided not to make me read crap, despite my saying I’d read anything.

  1. Tales of Unease, sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
  2. Journal 64, Jussi Adler-Olsen (Danish).
  3. Second Chance, Danielle Steele.
  4. Sense and Sensibility, Jane Austen.
  5. Morning, Noon and Night, Sidney Sheldon.
  6. Marked, P. C. Cast and Kristin Cast.
  7. A Bend in the Road, Nicholas Sparks.
  8. A Game of Thrones, George R. R. Martin.
  9. Mistress of the Art of Death, Ariana Franklin.
  10. Gallileo’s Dream, Kim Stanley Robinson.
  11. Duma Key, Stephen King.
  12. The Outcast, Sadie Jones.
  13. Arabat, Clive Barker.
  14. The Colour of Magic, Terry Pratchett.
  15. Imperium, Robert Harris.
  16. The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, Douglas Adams.
  17. Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell, Susanna Clarke.
  18. The End of Mr. Y, Scarlett Thomas.
  19. The Hobbit, J. R. R. Tolkien.
  20. Fight Club, Chuck Palahnuik.
  21. The Dice Man, Luke Rhinehart.
  22. The Fry Chronicles, Stephen Fry.
  23. The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ, Philip Pullman.
  24. The Divine Comedy, Dante Aleghieri.
  25. En ufo gør entré, Jonas Gardell (Swedish, reading in Danish).
  26. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, L. Frank Baum.
  27. Ned til hundene, Helle Helle (Danish).
  28. 7.a, Bjarne Reuter (Danish).
  29. Lille Virgil, Ole Lund Kirkegaard.
  30. Animal Farm, George Orwell.
  31. The Help, Kathryn Stockett.
  32. Wild Swans: Three Daughters of China, Jung Chang.
  33. Becoming Madame Mao, Anchee Min.
  34. The Princess Bride, William Goldman.
  35. The Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister, Gregory Maguire.
  36. Brave New World, Aldous Huxley.
  37. Lord of the Flies, William Golding.
  38. The Gods Themselves, Isaac Asimov.
  39. Ondskaben, Jan Guillou (Swedish, reading in Danish).
  40. Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury.
  41. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Roald Dahl.
  42. Good Omens, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman.
  43. The Uncommon Reader, Alan Bennett.
  44. I, Claudius, Robert Graves.
  45. Cat’s Cradle, Kurt Vonnegut.

So, yeah, there is crap on there, surely, but all crap was chosen by me (because I’m a big, fat cheat and I’m gonna suffer for breaking the ancient code of reading challenges). The rules are simple: I’m gonna read a book a week and except for the first two, I’m gonna pick them randomly – I’ve made little notes with numbers and put them in my lovely Twilight-tin box-thingy and everything (don’t you just love friends who give you stuff you really don’t want?)

So, I hope you fancy joining me on my litterary quest of awesome (and, frankly, non-awesome, because I’m gonna read Danielle Steel and it’s gonna get ugly) – maybe you’re inspired to do the same? Maybe you just want to read my bitchy, snarky posts? Maybe you just want a snack? In any case, I’ll do my best! (But I can’t promise I’ll give snacks).

//Gnasler